A jig is perhaps the most universal of all of lure types. They can be fished in a variety of ways and used with live bait or artificial options. They come in a variety of shapes, sizes, and color combinations. Additionally, they also vary in terms of composition, which has a significant impact on factors like density, shape, cost, and environmental considerations.

Jig composition can be broken down into two main categories: lead and tungsten. From a historical perspective, lead jigs have dominated the marketplace and still make up a lot of the jig options on the market. In recent years, tungsten jig options have become more readily available, particularly in the ice fishing world. Both jig types have features that shine in specific situations.

Shapes, sizes, and weights

The most-talked-about differences between lead and tungsten relate to their overall densities. Tungsten is a much denser metal than lead, which allows for a much smaller profile in the same weight class as lead. Take two 1/16-ounce jigs, for example (one tungsten and one lead). Although they are in the same weight class, the tungsten version would be significantly smaller than the lead version. Certain situations, like roaming panfish, benefit from a smaller profile without sacrificing on weight.

The density difference between tungsten and lead also result in varying fall rates, with tungsten having a much quicker fall rate than lead. In some situations, this is advantageous. For example, the denser options punch through slush and snow much more effectively than their less-dense counterparts. In some instances, however, the slower fall rate of lead can sometimes be exactly what the fish are looking for.

Perhaps the most limiting factor relating to composition are the available shapes. Due to limitations in manufacturing and the overall cost of production, tungsten jig shapes are typically limited to a handful of choices, whereas lead can easily be manipulated into a wide variety of shape options.

Cost factors

There are stark cost differences between tungsten and lead. Lead is surely the more economical choice, as on average, it’s typically 30 percent cheaper than its tungsten counterpart. Lead is more widely available, relatively inexpensive, and has had its place on store shelves for decades. Tungsten, on the other hand, has a much higher manufacturing cost which results in a higher retail cost. Tungsten options are becoming more and more available, however. As a result, the cost differences between the two are proving less obvious. No matter how you fish, you’re eventually going to lose some jigs, and losing the less-expensive options will hurt your pocketbook a little less.

Sensitivity and durability

In addition to the differences in shapes, costs, and density, lead and tungsten jigs also vary in levels of sensitivity. In terms of sensitivity, tungsten jigs certainly take the cake. While having the utmost sensitivity isn’t exactly a necessity in every fishing scenario, it can be particularly advantageous in specific situations. For example, the enhanced feel is ideal for detecting changes in bottom composition.

Both lead and tungsten jigs are durable and perform at a high level. Both jig types can be used time after time without too much wear. In a side-by-side comparison, tungsten-based jigs will typically outlast lead-based jigs simply due to their composition. By nature, tungsten is a harder metal than lead, therefore giving it the ability to withstand more abuse.

Environmental factors

Environmental considerations should also be taken into account when choosing jig types. While lead jigs have been around for decades, the environmental impacts they cause can be potentially troublesome. Lead is a far more toxic material than many other lure making resources. Over the last decade or so, new rules and regulations have been implemented in many parts of the United States which restrict or prohibit the sale and use of lead-based lures. While lead will likely never be fully banned, the increase in restrictions should cause fishermen to tread lightly when buying new tackle. From an environmentally conscious perspective, tungsten is ultimately the better choice.

Truth be told, both lead and tungsten options should have a place in your angling arsenal.

Keep up with what’s happening in the sportfishing industry. Check out the articles in every issue of MidWest Outdoors. Subscribe on our website.